• 1.

    Adoption of the Paris Agreement, 21st Conference of the Parties, Paris COP21 Decision 1/CP.20 (UNFCCC, 2015).

  • 2.

    Carney, M. Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizon—Climate Change and Financial Stability (Bank of England, 2015).

  • 3.

    TCFD Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TFCD, 2017).

  • 4.

    Changing Course: A Comprehensive Investor Guide to Scenario-Based Methods for Climate Risk Assessment in Response to the TCFD (UNEP FI, 2019).

  • 5.

    First Comprehensive Report—A Call for Action: Climate Change as a Source of Financial Risks (NGFS, 2019).

  • 6.

    Taxonomy Technical Report (EU TEG, 2019).

  • 7.

    Report on EU Green Bond Standard (EU TEG, 2019).

  • 8.

    Report on EU Benchmarks (EU TEG, 2019).

  • 9.

    LOI no 2015-992 du 17 Août 2015 Relative à la Transition Energétique pour la Croissance Verte (Legifrance, 2025); https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000031044385/

  • 10.

    ESG Data in China: Recommendations for Primary ESG Indicators (UNEP FI, 2019).

  • 11.

    The Bank’s of England Climate-Related Financial Disclosure 2020 (Bank of England, 2020).

  • 12.

    Mandatory Climate-Related Disclosures (Ministry for the Environment, 2020); https://www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/climate-change-and-government/mandatory-climate-related-financial-disclosures

  • 13.

    Best Practices in Corporate Climate Disclosure: How the Leaders are Leading (S&P Trucost, 2019).

  • 14.

    Fama, E. Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J. Financ. 25, 383–417 (1970).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Fama, E. Efficient capital markets: II. J. Financ. 46, 1575–1617 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Ameli, N., Drummond, P., Bisaro, A., Grubb, M. & Chenet, H. Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: why transparency is not enough. Climatic Change 160, 565–589 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Jackson, G., Bartosch, J., Avetisyan, E., Kinderman, D. & Knudsen, J. S. Mandatory non-financial disclosure and its influence on CSR: an international comparison. J. Bus. Ethics 162, 323–342 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    García‐Sánchez, I. ‐M., Hussain, N., Martínez‐Ferrero, J. & Ruiz‐Barbadillo, E. Impact of disclosure and assurance quality of corporate sustainability reports on access to finance. Corp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manage. 26, 832–848 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Perera, L., Jubb, C. & Gopalan, S. A comparison of voluntary and mandated climate change-related disclosure. J. Contemp. Account. Econ. 15, 243–266 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Monasterolo, I., Battiston, S., Janetos, A. C. & Zheng, Z. Vulnerable yet relevant: the two dimensions of climate-related financial disclosure. Climatic Change 145, 495–507 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Goldstein, A. et al. The private sector’s climate change risk and adaptation blind spots. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 18–25 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Edwards, I., Yapp, K., Mackay, S. & Mackey, B. Climate-related financial disclosures in the public sector. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 588–591 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Christophers, B. Climate change and financial instability: risk disclosure and the problematics of neoliberal governance. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 107, 1108–1127 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Krueger, P., Sautner, Z. & Starks, L. T. The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33, 1067–1111 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Christophers, B. Environmental beta or how institutional investors think about climate change and fossil fuel risk. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 109, 754–774 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Bernhardt, A. et al. The Long and Winding Road: How Long-Only Equity Managers Turn Over Their Portfolios Every 1.7 Years (Mercer, 2° Investing Initiative & The Generation Foundation, 2017).

  • 27.

    Naqvi, M., Burke, B., Hector, S., Jamison, T. & Dupre, S. All Swans are Black in the Dark—How the Short-Term Focus of Financial Analysis Does Not Shed Light on Long Term Risks (2° Investing Initiative, 2017).

  • 28.

    Thomä, J., Weber, C., Dupré, S. & Naqvi, M. The Long-Term Risk Signal Valley of Death: Exploring the Tragedy of the Horizon (2° Investing Initiative, 2015).

  • 29.

    Johnson, O. W., du Pont, P. & Gueguen-Teil, C. Perceptions of climate-related risk in Southeast Asia’s power sector. Clim. Policy 21, 264–276 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Silver, N. Blindness to risk: why institutional investors ignore the risk of stranded assets. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 7, 99–113 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Sen, S. & von Schickfus, M. T. Climate policy, stranded assets, and investors’ expectations. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 100, 102277 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Special Climate Change Resolution at Barclays Plc for Consideration at 2020 AGM (ShareAction, 2020); https://shareaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Barclays-Plc-2020-shareholder-resolution-ShareAction.pdf

  • 33.

    Braungardt, S., van den Bergh, J. & Dunlop, T. Fossil fuel divestment and climate change: reviewing contested arguments. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 50, 191–200 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Ayling, J. & Gunningham, N. Non-state governance and climate policy: the fossil fuel divestment movement. Clim. Policy 17, 131–149 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Fossil Free (2020); https://gofossilfree.org/divestment/commitments/

  • 36.

    Bergman, N. Impacts of the fossil fuel divestment movement: effects on finance, policy and public discourse. Sustainability 10, 2529 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Tollefson, J. Reality check for fossil-fuel divestment. Nature 521, 16–17 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Banking on Climate Chaos: Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2021 (Rainforest Action Network, 2021).

  • 39.

    Schifeling, T. & Hoffman, A. J. Bill McKibben’s influence on US climate change discourse: shifting field-level debates through radical flank effects. Org. Environ 32, 213–233 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Bloomberg Terminals, S&P 500 and MSCI Index Composition and Returns (Bloomberg, S&P, MSCI, 2021).

  • 41.

    Olson, B. Hess has been 2019’s top oil and gas stock. It has nothing to do with shale. The Wall Street Journal (20 August 2019).

  • 42.

    Plantinga, A. & Scholtens, B. The financial impact of fossil fuel divestment. Clim. Policy 21, 107–119 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Trinks, A., Scholtens, B., Mulder, M. & Dam, L. Fossil fuel divestment and portfolio performance. Ecol. Econ. 146, 740–748 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Henriques, I. & Sadorsky, P. Investor implications of divesting from fossil fuels. Glob. Financ. J. 38, 30–44 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Huang, W. & Mollick, A. V. Tight oil, real WTI prices and US stock returns. Energy Econ. 85, 104574 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Ewing, B. T., Kang, W. & Ratti, R. A. The dynamic effects of oil supply shocks on the US stock market returns of upstream oil and gas companies. Energy Econ. 72, 505–516 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Basher, S. A., Haug, A. A. & Sadorsky, P. The impact of oil-market shocks on stock returns in major oil-exporting countries. J. Int. Money Financ. 86, 264–280 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Bloomberg Terminals: Crude Oil Historical Data (2020).

  • 49.

    OPEC Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 (OPEC, 2019).

  • 50.

    Short-Term Energy Outlook (EIA, 2020).

  • 51.

    McGlade, C. & Ekins, P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 517, 187–190 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Semieniuk, G., Campiglio, E., Mercure, J. F., Ulrich, V. & Edwards, N. R. Low-carbon transition risks for finance. WIREs Clim. Change 2020, e678 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Van der Ploeg, F. & Rezai, A. Stranded assets in the transition to a carbon-free economy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12, 281–298 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Mercure, J. F. et al. Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 588–593 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Shell and BP’s debt problems are getting worse. Bloomberg Opinions (30 June 2020).

  • 56.

    Ozsoylev, H. N., Walden, J., Yavuz, M. D. & Bildik, R. Investor networks in the stock market. Rev. Financ. Stud. 27, 1323–1366 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Masini, A. & Menichetti, E. Investment decisions in the renewable energy sector: an analysis of non-financial drivers. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80, 510–524 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Yergin, D. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power (Simon and Schuster, 2011).

  • 59.

    Stern, J. & Imsirovic, A. A Comparative History of Oil and Gas Markets and Prices: Is 2020 Just an Extreme Cyclical Event or an Acceleration of the Energy Transition? Energy Insight 68 (Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2020).

  • 60.

    Evans, B., Nyquist, S. & Yanosek, K. Mergers in a low-oil-price environment: proceed with caution. J. Pet. Technol. 68, 49–51 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    World Energy Investment 2020 (IEA, 2020).

  • 62.

    Renewables 2008: Global Status Report (REN21, 2009).

  • 63.

    Renewables 2009: Global Status Report (REN21, 2010).

  • 64.

    Butler, N. The private sector alone will not deliver the energy transition. Financial Times (27 October 2019).

  • 65.

    Alolo, M., Azevedo, A. & El Kalak, I. The effect of the feed-in-system policy on renewable energy investments: evidence from the EU countries. Energy Econ. 92, 104998 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Liu, W., Zhang, X. & Feng, S. Does renewable energy policy work? Evidence from a panel data analysis. Renew. Energy 135, 635–642 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. S. How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy? A systematic review with an investor perspective. Appl. Energy 236, 1249–1268 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Wall, R., Grafakos, S., Gianoli, A. & Stavropoulos, S. Which policy instruments attract foreign direct investments in renewable energy? Clim. Policy 19, 59–72 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Frankel, D., Janecke, N., Kühn, F., Ritzenhofen, I. & Winter, R. Rethinking the Renewable Strategy for an Age of Global Competition (McKinsey, 2019).

  • 70.

    Bloomberg Terminals, Market Capitalization and Revenues Data (Bloomberg, 2020).

  • 71.

    Herciu, M. in Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings (eds Studzieniecki, T. et al.) 420–428 (2018).

  • 72.

    Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F. & Visentin, G. A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 283–288 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Donovan, C., Fomicov, M., Gerdes, L. K. & Waldron, M. Energy Investing: Exploring Risk and Return in the Capital Markets (CCFI & IEA, 2020).

  • 74.

    Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2020 (Frankfurt School–UNEP, 2020).

  • 75.

    Stein, A. L. Breaking energy path dependencies. Brook. L. Rev. 82, 559 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 76.

    Granoff, I., Hogarth, J. R. & Miller, A. Nested barriers to low-carbon infrastructure investment. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1065–1071 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 77.

    Polzin, F. & Sanders, M. How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe? Energy Policy 147, 111863 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 78.

    Ragosa, G. & Warren, P. Unpacking the determinants of cross-border private investment in renewable energy in developing countries. J. Clean. Prod. 235, 854–865 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 79.

    Mazzucato, M. & Semieniuk, G. Financing renewable energy: who is financing what and why it matters. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 127, 8–22 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 80.

    Barazza, E. & Strachan, N. The co-evolution of climate policy and investments in electricity markets: Simulating agent dynamics in UK, German and Italian electricity sectors. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 65, 101458 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 81.

    Donovan, C. W. (ed.) Renewable Energy Finance: Powering the Future (World Scientific, 2015).

  • 82.

    Deleidi, M., Mazzucato, M. & Semieniuk, G. Neither crowding in nor out: public direct investment mobilising private investment into renewable electricity projects. Energy Policy 140, 111195 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 83.

    Owen, R., Brennan, G. & Lyon, F. Enabling investment for the transition to a low carbon economy: government policy to finance early stage green innovation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31, 137–145 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 84.

    Donovan, C. W. (ed.) Renewable Energy Finance: Powering the Future (World Scientific, 2020).

  • 85.

    Castrejon-Campos, O., Aye, L. & Hui, F. K. P. Making policy mixes more robust: an integrative and interdisciplinary approach for clean energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 64, 101425 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 86.

    Lindberg, M. B., Markard, J. & Andersen, A. D. Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: a study of the EU’s energy policy mix. Res. Policy 48, 103668 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 87.

    Schmidt, T. S. & Sewerin, S. Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes—an empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries. Res. Policy 48, 103557 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 88.

    Dikau, S. & Volz, U. Central bank mandates, sustainability objectives and the promotion of green finance. Ecol. Econ. 184, 107022 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 89.

    D’Orazio, P. & Popoyan, L. Fostering green investments and tackling climate-related financial risks: which role for macroprudential policies? Ecol. Econ. 160, 25–37 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 90.

    Campiglio, E. et al. Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 462–468 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 91.

    Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth COM/2018/097 (European Commission, 2018).

  • 92.

    Dafermos, Y., Gabor, D., Nikolaidi, M., Pawloff, A. & van Lerven, F. Decarbonising is Easy: Beyond Market Neutrality in the ECB’s Crporate QE (New Economics Foundation, 2020).

  • 93.

    Geddes, A. & Schmidt, T. S. Integrating finance into the multi-level perspective: technology niche-finance regime interactions and financial policy interventions. Res. Policy 49, 103985 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 94.

    Donaubauer, J., Neumayer, E. & Nunnenkamp, P. Financial market development in host and source countries and their effects on bilateral foreign direct investment. World Econ. 43, 534–556 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 95.

    Bilir, L. K., Chor, D. & Manova, K. Host-country financial development and multinational activity. Eur. Econ. Rev. 115, 192–220 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 96.

    Schmidt, T. Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 237–239 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 97.

    Steffen, B. Estimating the cost of capital for renewable energy projects. Energy Econ. 88, 104783 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 98.

    Egli, F., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. Bias in energy system models with uniform cost of capital assumption. Nat. Commun. 10, 4588 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 99.

    Matthäus, D. & Mehling, M. De-risking renewable energy investments in developing countries: a multilateral guarantee mechanism. Joule 4, 2627–2645 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 100.

    Ameli, N. et al. Higher cost of finance exacerbates a climate investment trap in developing economies. Nat. Commun. 12, 4046 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *