Shettleworth, S. J. Cognition, Evolution, and the Study of Behavior (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
Zentall, T. R. & Wasserman, E. A. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Cognition (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
Madden, J. R., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., Beardsworth, C. E. & van Horik, J. O. The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 373, 20170297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0297 (2018).
Morand-Ferron, J., Cole, E. F. & Quinn, J. L. Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challenges. Biol. Revs. 91, 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12174 (2016).
Byrne, R. & Whiten, A. Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).
Dunbar, R. I. M. & Shultz, S. Evolution in the social brain. Science 317, 1344–1347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145463 (2007).
Parker, S. T. & Gibson, K. R. Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes. J. Hum. Evol. 6, 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(77)80135-8 (1977).
Milton, K. Foraging behaviour and the evolution of primate intelligence. In Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans (eds Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A.) 285–305 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).
Rosati, A. G. Foraging cognition: reviving the ecological intelligence hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.011 (2017).
Sol, D., Sayol, F., Ducatez, S. & Lefebvre, L. The life-history basis of behavioural innovations. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 371, 20150187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0187 (2016).
Boogert, N. J., Madden, J. R., Morand-Ferron, J. & Thornton, A. Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170280. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0280 (2018).
Griffin, A. S., Guillette, L. M. & Healy, S. D. Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.012 (2015).
Dukas, R. 2004 Evolutionary biology of animal cognition. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 35, 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130152 (2004).
Guenther, A. & Brust, V. Individual consistency in multiple cognitive performance: behavioural versus cognitive syndromes. Anim. Behav. 130, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.011 (2017).
Guillette, L. M., Hahn, A. H., Hoeschele, M., Przyslupski, A.-M. & Sturdy, C. B. Individual differences in learning speed, performance accuracy and exploratory behaviour in black-capped chickadees. Anim. Cogn. 18, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0787-3 (2015).
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317, 1360–1366. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146282 (2007).
Cauchoix, M. et al. The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 373, 20170281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0281 (2018).
Dougherty, L. R. & Guillette, L. M. Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170282. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0282 (2018).
Keagy, J., Minter, R. & Tinghitella, R. M. Sex differences in cognition and their relationship to male mate choice. Curr. Zool. 65, 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoz014 (2019).
Lucon-Xiccato, T. & Bisazza, A. Sex differences in spatial abilities and cognitive flexibility in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 123, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.026 (2017).
Guillette, L. M., Naguib, M. & Griffin, A. S. Individual differences in cognition and personality. Behav. Process. 134, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.001 (2017).
Sih, A. & Del Giudice, M. Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 367, 2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216 (2012).
Carere, C. & Locurto, C. Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition. Curr. Zool. 57, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.4.491 (2011).
Weiss, A. Personality traits: a view from the animal kingdom. J. Personal. 86, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12310 (2018).
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T. & Dingemanse, N. J. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev. 82, 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.x (2007).
Sih, A., Bell, A. M., Johnson, J. C. & Ziemba, R. E. Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 241–277. https://doi.org/10.1086/422893 (2004).
McCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. J. Personal. 60(2), 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x (1992).
Carter, A. J., Feeney, W. E., Marshall, H. H., Cowlishaw, G. & Heinsohn, R. Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring?. Biol. Rev. 88, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12007 (2013).
Koski, S. E. Broader horizons for animal personality research. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2, 70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00070 (2014).
Wilson, V., Guenther, A., Øverli, Ø., Seltmann, M. W. & Altschul, D. Future directions for personality research: contributing new insights to the understanding of animal behavior. Animals 9, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050240 (2019).
Seyfarth, R. M., Silk, J. B. & Cheney, D. L. Variation in personality and fitness in wild female baboons. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 16980–16985. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210780109 (2012).
Seltmann, M. W., Helle, S., Htut, W. & Lahdenperä, M. Males have more aggressive and less sociable personalities than females in semi-captive Asian elephants. Sci. Rep. 9, 2668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39915-7 (2019).
Webster, M. M. & Ward, A. J. W. Personality and social context. Biol. Rev. 86, 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00169.x (2011).
Krause, J., James, R. & Croft, D. P. Personality in the context of social networks. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 365, 4099–4106. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0216 (2010).
Verspeek, J., Staes, N., van Leeuwen, E. J. C., Eens, M. & Stevens, J. M. G. Bonobo personality predicts friendship. Sci. Rep. 9, 19245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55884-3 (2019).
Ebenau, A., von Borell, C., Penke, L., Ostner, J. & Schülke, O. Personality homophily affects male social bonding in wild Assamese macaques, Macaca assamensis. Anim. Behav. 155, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.05.020 (2019).
Massen, J. J. M. & Koski, S. E. Chimps of a feather sit together: chimpanzee friendships are based on homophily in personality. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.008 (2014).
Seyfarth, R. M., Silk, J. B. & Cheney, D. L. Social bonds in female baboons: the interaction between personality, kinship and rank. Anim. Behav. 87, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.008 (2014).
Planas-Sitjà, I., Deneubourg, J.-L., Gibon, C. & Sempo, G. Group personality during collective decision-making: a multi-level approach. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 282, 20142515. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2515 (2015).
Koski, S. E. & Burkart, J. M. Common marmosets show social plasticity and group-level similarity in personality. Sci. Rep. 5, 8878. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08878 (2015).
Šlipogor, V., Gunhold-de Oliveira, T., Tadić, Z., Massen, J. J. M. & Bugnyar, T. Consistent inter-individual differences in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in Boldness-Shyness, Stress-Activity, and Exploration-Avoidance. Am. J. Primatol. 78, 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22566 (2016).
Šlipogor, V., Massen, J. J. M., Schiel, N., Souto, A. & Bugnyar, T. Temporal consistency and ecological validity of personality structure in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): a unifying field and laboratory approach. Am. J. Primatol. 83, 23229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23229 (2021).
De Raad, B. & Schouwenburg, H. C. Personality in learning and education: a review. Eur. J. Personal. 10, 303–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5%3c303::AID-PER262%3e3.0.CO;2-2 (1996).
Poropat, A. E. A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychol. Bull. 135, 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996 (2009).
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R. & Avdic, A. The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personal. Individ. Differ. 51, 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019 (2011).
Mazza, V. & Guenther, A. City mice and country mice: innovative problem solving in rural and urban noncommensal rodents. Anim. Behav. 172, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.12.007 (2021).
Range, F., Bugnyar, T., Schlögl, C. & Kotrschal, K. Individual and sex differences in learning abilities of ravens. Behav. Process. 73, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.002 (2006).
Matzel, L. D. et al. Individual differences in the expression of a “general” learning ability in mice. J. Neurosc. 23, 6423–6433. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-16-06423.2003 (2003).
Mazza, V., Jacob, J., Dammhahn, M., Zaccaroni, M. & Eccard, J. A. Individual variation in cognitive style reflects foraging and anti-predator strategies in a small mammal. Sci. Rep. 9, 10157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46582-1 (2019).
Altschul, D. M., Wallace, E. K., Sonnweber, R., Tomonaga, M. & Weiss, A. Chimpanzee intellect: personality, performance and motivation with touchscreen tasks. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170169 (2017).
Amy, M., van Oers, K. & Naguib, M. Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major). Anim. Cogn. 15, 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0500-3 (2012).
Boogert, N. J., Reader, S. M. & Laland, K. N. The relation between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. Anim. Behav. 72, 1229–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.021 (2006).
Guillette, L. M., Reddon, A. R., Hoeschele, M. & Sturdy, C. B. Sometimes slower is better: slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 278, 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1669 (2011).
Mazza, V., Eccard, J. A., Zaccaroni, M., Jacob, J. & Dammhahn, M. The fast and the flexible: cognitive style drives individual variation in cognition in a small mammal. Anim. Behav. 137, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.01.011 (2018).
Carazo, P., Noble, D. W. A., Chandrasoma, D. & Whiting, M. J. Sex and boldness explain individual differences in spatial learning in a lizard. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 281, 20133275. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3275 (2014).
Huebner, F., Fichtel, C. & Kappeler, P. M. Linking cognition with fitness in a wild primate: fitness correlates of problem-solving performance and spatial learning ability. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170295. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0295 (2018).
Nawroth, C., Prentice, P. M. & McElligott, A. G. Individual personality differences in goats predict their performance in visual learning and non-associative cognitive tasks. Behav. Process 134, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.08.001 (2017).
Rowe, C. & Healy, S. D. Measuring variation in cognition. Behav. Ecol. 25, 1287–1292. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru090 (2014).
Dammhahn, M., Mazza, V., Schirmer, A., Göttsche, C. & Eccard, J. A. Of city and village mice: behavioural adjustments of striped field mice to urban environments. Sci. Rep. 10, 13056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69998-6 (2020).
Mazza, V., Dammhahn, M., Lösche, E. & Eccard, J. A. 2020 Small mammals in the big city: behavioural adjustments of non-commensal rodents to urban environments. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6326–6337. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15304 (2020).
Chow, P. K. Y., Clayton, N. S. & Steele, M. A. Cognitive performance of wild Eastern grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) in rural and urban, native and non-native environments. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.615899 (2021).
Chow, P. K. Y., Uchida, K., von Bayern, A. M. & Koizumi, I. Characteristics of urban environments and novel problem-solving performance in Eurasian red squirrels. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 288, 20202832. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2832 (2021).
Boucherie, P. H., Loretto, M.-C., Massen, J. J. M. & Bugnyar, T. What constitutes “social complexity” and “social intelligence” in birds? Lessons from ravens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2607-2 (2019).
Wascher, C. A. F., Kulahci, I. G., Langley, E. J. G. & Shaw, R. C. How does cognition shape social relationships?. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 373, 20170293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0293 (2018).
Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. Social cognition. Anim. Behav. 103, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.030 (2015).
Dalesman, S. Habitat and social context affect memory phenotype, exploration and covariance among these traits. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170291. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0291 (2018).
Burkart, J. M. & van Schaik, C. P. Revisiting the consequences of cooperative breeding. J. Zool. 299, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12322 (2016).
Horn, L. et al. Sex-specific effects of cooperative breeding and colonial nesting on prosociality in corvids. Elife 9, 58139. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58139 (2020).
Horn, L., Scheer, C., Bugnyar, T. & Massen, J. J. M. Proactive prosociality in a cooperatively breeding corvid, the azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyana). Biol. Let. 12, 20160649. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0649 (2016).
Gunhold, T., Whiten, A. & Bugnyar, T. Video demonstrations seed alternative problem-solving techniques in wild common marmosets. Biol. Let. 10, 20140439. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0439 (2014).
Thornton, A. & Samson, J. Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. Anim. Behav. 83, 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.018 (2012).
Smit, J. A. H. & van Oers, K. Personality types vary in their personal and social information use. Anim. Behav. 151, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.02.002 (2019).
Aplin, L. M. & Morand-Ferron, J. Stable producer–scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 284, 20162872. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2872 (2017).
Garber, P. A. et al. Trait variation and trait stability in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) inhabiting ecologically distinct habitats in northeastern Brazil. Am. J. Primatol. 81, e23018. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23018 (2019).
Malukiewicz, J. et al. An introduction to the Callithrix genus and overview of recent advances in marmoset research. ILAR J 61(2–3), 110–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilab027 (2020).
de Oliveira Terceiro, F. E. et al. Higher social tolerance in wild versus captive common marmosets: the role of interdependence. Sci. Rep. 11, 825. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80632-3 (2021).
Goldizen, A. W. Tamarin and marmoset mating systems: unusual flexibility. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90045-6 (1988).
Day, R. L., Coe, R. L., Kendal, J. R. & Laland, K. N. Neophilia, innovation and social learning: A study of intergeneric differences in callitrichid monkeys. Anim. Behav. 65(3), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2074 (2003).
Schiel, N. & Souto, A. The common marmoset: an overview of its natural history, ecology and behavior. Dev. Neurobiol. 77, 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22458 (2017).
Gunhold, T., Massen, J. J. M., Schiel, N., Souto, A. & Bugnyar, T. Memory, transmission and persistence of alternative foraging techniques in wild common marmosets. Anim. Behav. 91, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.023 (2014).
Gunhold, T., Range, F., Huber, L. & Bugnyar, T. Long-term fidelity of foraging techniques in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Am. J. Primatol. 77, 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22342 (2015).
Schiel, N. & Huber, L. Social influences on the development of foraging behavior in free-living common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Am. J. Primatol. 68, 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20284 (2006).
Snowdon, C. T. Social processes in communication and cognition in callitrichid monkeys: a review. Anim. Cogn. 4, 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710100094 (2001).
Bugnyar, T. & Huber, L. Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets. Anim. Behav. 54, 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0497 (1997).
Voelkl, B. & Huber, L. True imitation in marmosets. Anim. Behav. 60, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1457 (2000).
Burkart, J. M., Strasser, A. & Foglia, M. Trade-offs between social learning and individual innovativeness in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Anim. Behav. 77, 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.006 (2009).
Tomassetti, D. et al. Personality and lateralization in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behav. Process. 167, 103899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103899 (2019).
Masilkova, M., Weiss, A., Šlipogor, V. & Konečná, M. Comparative assessment of behaviorally derived personality structures in golden-handed tamarins (Saguinus midas), cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus), and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). J. Comp. Psychol. 134, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000226 (2020).
Šlipogor, V., Burkart, J. M., Martin, J. S., Bugnyar, T. & Koski, S. E. Personality method validation in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): getting the best of both worlds. J. Comp. Psychol. 134, 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000188 (2020).
Martin, J. S. et al. The EGA+GNM framework: an integrative approach to modelling behavioural syndromes. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13100 (2019).
Weiss, A., Yokoyama, C., Hayashi, T. & Inoue-Murayama, M. 2021 Personality, subjective well-being, and the serotonin 1a receptor gene in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). PLoS ONE 16(8), 0238663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238663 (2021).
Inoue-Murayama, M., Yokoyama, C., Yamanashi, Y. & Weiss, A. Common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) personality, subjective well-being, hair cortisol level and AVPR1a, OPRM1, and DAT genotypes. Sci. Rep. 8, 10255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28112-7 (2018).
Koski, S. E. et al. Common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) personality. J. Comp. Psychol. 131, 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000089 (2017).
Iwanicki, S. & Lehmann, J. Behavioral and trait rating assessments of personality in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). J. Comp. Psychol. 129, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039318 (2015).
Majolo, B., Buchanan-Smith, H. M. & Bell, J. Response to novel objects and foraging tasks by common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) female pairs. Lab Anim. 32, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0303-32 (2003).
du Sert, N. P. et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PloS Biol 18, e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 (2020).
Coleman, K., Tully, L. A. & McMillan, J. L. Temperament correlates with training success in adult rhesus macaques. Am. J. Primatol. 65, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20097 (2005).
Péter, A. Solomon Coder (version beta 17.03.22): A simple and free solution for behavior coding; https://solomon.andraspeter.com/ (2017).
Úbeda, Y., Ortín, S., St Leger, J., Llorente, M. & Almunia, J. Personality in captive killer whales (Orcinus orca): a rating approach based on the five-factor model. J. Comp. Psychol. 133, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000146 (2019).
Morton, F. B. & Altschul, D. Data reduction analyses of animal behaviour: avoiding Kaiser’s criterion and adopting more robust automated methods. Anim. Behav. 149, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2019.01.003 (2019).
Zientek, L. R. & Thompson, B. Applying the bootstrap to the multivariate case: bootstrap component/factor analysis. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193163 (2007).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Method Res. 33, 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644 (2004).
Takemoto, A. et al. Individual variability in visual discrimination and reversal learning performance in common marmosets. Neurosci. Res. 93, 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.001 (2015).
Munger, E. L., Takemoto, A., Raghanti, M. A. & Nakamura, K. Visual discrimination and reversal learning in aged common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Neurosci. Res. 124, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2017.06.002 (2017).
Bartus, R. T., Dean, R. L. & Fleming, D. L. Aging in the rhesus monkey: effects on visual discrimination learning and reversal learning. J. Gerontol. 34, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/34.2.209 (1979).
Languille, S. et al. The grey mouse lemur: a non-human primate model for ageing studies. Ageing Res. Rev. 11, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.07.001 (2012).
Moore, T. L., Killiany, R. J., Herndon, J. G., Rosene, D. L. & Moss, M. B. Impairment in abstraction and set shifting in aged Rhesus monkeys. Neurobiol. Aging 24, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00054-4 (2003).
Sadoun, A., Rosito, M., Fonta, C. & Girard, P. Key periods of cognitive decline in a nonhuman primate model of cognitive aging, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Neurobiol. Aging 74, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.003 (2019).
Brucks, D., Marshall-Pescini, S., Wallis, L. J., Huber, L. & Range, F. Measures of dogs’ inhibitory control abilities do not correlate across tasks. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0084 (2017).
Bond, A. B., Kamil, A. C. & Balda, R. P. Serial reversal learning and the evolution of behavioral flexibility in three species of North American corvids (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica). J. Comp. Psychol. 121, 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.372 (2007).
Tebbich, S., Sterelny, K. & Teschke, I. The tale of the finch: adaptive radiation and behavioural flexibility. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 365, 1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0291 (2010).
LaClair, M. & Lacreuse, A. Reversal learning in gonadectomized marmosets with and without hormone replacement: are males more sensitive to punishment?. Anim. Cogn. 19, 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0966-5 (2016).
Schubiger, M. N., Wüstholz, F. L., Wunder, A. & Burkart, J. M. High emotional reactivity toward an experimenter affects participation, but not performance, in cognitive tests with common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim. Cogn. 18, 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0837-5 (2015).
Yamamoto, M. E., Domeniconi, C. & Box, H. Sex differences in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in response to an unfamiliar food task. Primates 45, 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-004-0088-6 (2004).
Griffin, A. S. & Guez, D. 2014 Innovation and problem solving: a review of common mechanisms. Behav. Process. 109, 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.027 (2014).
Cote, J., Clobert, J., Brodin, T., Fogarty, S. & Sih, A. Personality-dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 365, 4065–4076. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0176 (2010).
Taborsky, B. & Oliveira, R. F. Social competence: an evolutionary approach. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.09.003 (2012).