To kick off the final day of Brand-Led Culture
Change, attendees were treated to a broad series of examples, from a wide swath of experts, of clever strategies that lead to behavior change.
Finding the right levers: Strategies for effective behavior change
First up, Project InsideOut founder Renee
Lertzman and Christina Niemelä Ström, Head of Sustainability at IKEA
Supply, teamed up to explain why the newly developed or Internal Development
Goals are just as important as UN Sustainable Development Goals.
“It’s one thing to have targets, goals, metrics and pledges. But the real
question is, how do we actually get there? Because, as we all know, it is
complicated,” Lertzman said.
Cue the IDGs, developed by a coalition of partners — including the University
Stockholm School of Economics, Ashoka, IKEA, Google and Spotify —
and launched this year. Much like the SDGs, the IDGs are built around a
“synergistic, elegant, simple framework that just about any organization can
grab hold of and work with.” They are designed to get organisations thinking
about their competencies for integrity, authenticity, openness to learning,
mindset, self-awareness and presence. It enables them to assess and understand
their capability for critical
long-term orientation and visioning.
As one of the collaborating partners, IKEA got a chance to engage with the IDGs
framework when it was in its early stages of development.
“To work with complex issues and sustainability challenges … you need to pay big
attention also to the inner development of us as humans, individuals, and
together in teams. So, we wanted to work with that,” Ström said. The Swedish
company now plans to use the IDGs framework to enhance its response to the
sustainability challenge by embedding it into individual and team development
Another tangible strategy explored was that of Unilever’s mayonnaise brand,
Hellman’s. Benjamin Crook, the company’s Senior Marketing Director in
North America, was on hand to explain how creative marketing and comedy can help
to land sustainability messages. In 2021, the brand used its Super Bowl ad to
make sure its story was made loud and clear. It’s easier said than done, Crook
said. “Each year, there are 80 to 90 different Super Bowl commercial viewers to
watch. So, in a window of 30 seconds, you have to stand out and be remembered.
Knowing all of this, we set out to create something that would be unmissable.”
The result was a funny ad about food
“We felt that taking a comedic approach to convey our purpose could spark some
joy, provide some creative thinking and ‘a-ha’ moments for people when it comes
to food and their fridge.” The thinking was that comedy can deliver messages in
a way that drums up emotion, connection and conversation. It worked.
Beyond the funny commercials, Crook said it was crucial that Hellman’s helped to
educate its audience and work to make impactful change — so, for each Super Bowl
campaign, it ramped up its donation effort. “In 2022, we partnered with
Feeding America to provide 500,000 meals to those in need and secured an
additional 5,000 meals for every in-game tackle.”
Michiel Bakker, Google’s VP of Global Workplace Programs, closed out the
morning plenary by exploring how brands can apply holistic systems thinking to
solving behavioral change problems — and amplify their impact. The result is
called the Flywheel
Effect. Bakker asked the
audience to imagine that their goal was to nudge their employees into making
healthier and more sustainable food choices at work.
“A number of years ago, we decreased the size of our plates [in the canteen]
from 11 inches to 9. And guess what? That simple change enabled our workforce to
eat less on a daily basis. And they didn’t even realize it, because we just
changed the ecosystem. It’s one of the levers,” he explained.
Another example was how Google encouraged people to drink more water and less
soda in the workplace. “How do you go about it? It’s not by just telling people
and inviting them to drink more water.” Instead, they looked at the lever of
systems and changed the context of all beverage coolers around the world —
reorganizing products, placing bottled water below diet drinks. “It makes the
better choice the easier choice, and it works.”
How and when brands can best engage in crisis
There was a time when brands pleaded the fifth during crisis, but those days are
over. Brands are poised to leverage their influence to address key issues of the
day; but the line between doing the right thing and self-interest can often be a
Business action on social and environmental issues is often a buffer against
reputational and legal risk. Take, for example, the brand exodus from
after the coup in 2021. One unfortunate result was that the business vacuum was
filled by unethical kleptocrats and many suffered, particularly women.
When companies make black-and-white decisions, it’s usually to protect against
ESG risks. But that doesn’t always mean the best for the greater good.
“We can end up with unintended consequences that can actually make the problems
we’re trying to solve worse,” said Alison Taylor, Executive Director at
Ethical Systems and adjunct professor at
New York University.
Corporates tend to be risk averse, but they must be risk tolerant; and
defaulting to values and principles is the best way to strengthen resilience.
Elizabeth Morrison, Chief DEI Officer at Levi Strauss &
Co, described her company’s approach to using
foundational values as anchors during turbulent times — one of these values is
discretion on where to take a stand.
“If we speak out on everything, it will mean nothing,” Morrison pointed out.
Brands are facing bombardments on multiple fronts, both internally and
externally. These can’t be addressed with platitudes; nor should brands jump
every time someone yells on social media. Morrison’s advice: Be thoughtful on
the things you can meaningfully influence that are very impactful for
stakeholders and your business and don’t leverage PR at the expense of action.
Taylor warned against corporate rhetoric, citing the potential for brands to
generate backlash. Taylor and Morrison implored purposeful brands to only speak
out if their words match their
and are rooted in established values. Make decisions on that basis, and don’t
Taylor noted that the current, polarizing political discourse often isn’t
representative of the average consumer, so taking cues from Washington on
which issues to speak up against and how to address them isn’t the best idea. In
recent years, brands have been compelled to step up and speak up amidst an
environment rife with mudslinging and cancel
so, companies must center on their locus of influence and focus on their
principles. Building mechanisms for listening is the best way to combat rage and
“What we really need is to have a more grown-up discussion about what we should
expect corporations to do about issues and encourage them to get their own house
in order before they start taking controversial positions,” Taylor said.
Aligning leadership with values and principles fosters
and counters hypocrisy. But the best medicine is prevention; so, if society is
yelling at you to make a difference you can’t make, don’t say you can.
How to communicate corporate sustainability
How to communicate corporate sustainability is broad and nuanced — with factors
to consider including compliance and regulations; best practices; and the
omnipresent, slippery slope of
OneTrust runs the gamut between data privacy,
third-party risk management and ESG. Director of Product Marketing Jamie
Molnar shared how to deepen understanding of communicating corporate
sustainability efforts, and how to leverage ESG insights to drive clear,
authentic stakeholder communications around sustainability.
The sustainability transformation is among the biggest the business world has
ever seen, she said. It goes beyond carbon
— incorporating a broad range of drivers including identifying and measuring the
impact of policies and procedures, and how these policies and procedures impact
brand, revenue, company valuation, market perception and risk. Furthermore, ESG
acts as a driver for top-line growth by attracting talent, reducing costs, and
building trust among stakeholders — and trust is driving the next decade of
growth and differentiation, Molnar said.
“Trusting a brand is so much more important than it was before,” Molnar said,
citing the reputational risk done from high-profile data leaks among tech and
People only want to engage with brands that make them feel secure, she said,
citing changes in society, regulations and technology that have driven ESG
awareness in the past several years. And
research shows trust offers
a competitive advantage. People are 7x more willing to pay premium prices, 7x
more willing to share personal data, and 6x more loyal to brands they trust.
Consumer trust should be a main KPI and serve as a proxy for whether other ESG
targets are on track. Why? Because sustainability is important to nearly 8 in 10
consumers, with further indications that they are watching brands that act
“At the end of the day, CEOs have realized that ethically, [sustainability]
makes sense; but it also makes great sense for the business,” Molnar said.
These business benefits create feedback loops of change that ripple down the
value change, from C-suite to regulators.
Regulators, in particular, are poised to start forcing change in response to
corporate greenwashing. Europe recently adopted anti-greenwashing
and the SEC has proposed new
on climate impact-related disclosures.
First-movers in sustainability will have a strong advantage, Molnar said, citing
early adopters of the digital transformation. Sustainability will yield similar
seismic market changes, and similar benefits to brands that adopt early. Molnar
laid out best practices to aid in successful transition to the sustainable
Compliance: A first step
Marketing: Set targets and report on progress against those targets
Procurement: Ensure supplier alignment with ESG policies to mitigate
Corporate communications: Communicate to customers through verified
A breach or misalignment in any of the above could lead to reputational or
regulatory risk. Molnar provided three insights to consider when communicating
Be clear about what a brand promise is and isn’t. It must be measurable.
Fulfill on your brand promise or modify it if you can’t. Have a path to
Know consumer perception of your brand. Understand your place in the
marketplace, so you can align ESG initiatives with your competitors.
“At OneTrust, we believe what’s good for society is good for business,” Molnar
concluded. “ESG is really the most important KPI of our time, and we all hold it
in our hands to manage it right.”
Is carbon labeling right for you? Hint: the answer is ‘yes’
As Sandra Noonan, Chief Sustainability Officer at Just
Salad, explained: Carbon labeling is a great way to
“… forge a new conversation with consumers about the connection between what
we eat and our carbon footprint.”
Just Salad has been carbon-labeling its menu
since 2020. Noonan said an early challenge was tracking the final disposal of
consumer packaging waste. Only then was a full ‘cradle-to-grave’ LCA completed —
a process that measured the emissions of Just Salad’s ingredients during the
agricultural production, packaging, processing, distribution, consumer use and
end-of-life stages; as well as emissions from consumer packaging.
Meanwhile, mealkit giant HelloFresh is still
working towards publishing specific carbon-emission numbers. Director of
Sustainability Jeff Yorzyk said having LCA data for ingredients created new
opportunities for stakeholder engagement and recipe creation. With 87 percent of
food emissions coming from the on-farm agricultural stage and the land-use
change, Yorzyk acknowledged that a fundamental move is to source lower-carbon
foods. While continuing to work with its global supply chain towards this
long-term goal, HelloFresh launched a low-carbon label in its European market
and is piloting variant labels in the US.
Christina Lampert, Director of Growth and Innovation at
HowGood, understands that quantitative values alone are
not digestible. For products on HowGood’s climate-friendly food database, this
means qualifying products that have a farm-to-gate footprint that is lower than
70 percent of the 200 million products already rated by HowGood.
Edwina Hughes, head of WRI‘s Cool Food
explained that the “Cool Food
establishes a maximum recommended daily carbon footprint for a person’s diet
aligned with 2030 climate reduction goals — a threshold that is 38 percent
smaller than the current US average. Hughes emphasized the importance of making
carbon labeling simple, short and easy to understand. Currently, people are not
fluent enough in CO2
to make a decision based on detailed labels. It’s better to meet consumers where
they’re at and be selective with presentation of emissions data.
“It’s meant to engage consumers in a conversation around climate-friendly food,”
Lampert pointed out the many ways to illuminate carbon information to the
consumer. Just Salad, for instance, communicates carbon data in many creative
ways: It curates its lowest-carbon-emitting items into a dietary filter called
the ‘Climatarian’ menu, offers promotions for selection of low-carbon menu
items, and includes QR codes to allow easy access to a dish’s carbon data.
After launching the Climate Hero
for a segment of its European market, HelloFresh continues an exciting phase of
piloting different label formats in the US — including a ‘Climate Superstar’ tag
and an ABC gradient of high, medium or low CO2e ratings. With messaging, a
found that including environmental messages in a restaurant’s menu encouraged
consumers to select plant-based foods.
How can brands communicate about efforts that go beyond carbon emissions? For
Yorzyk, brands should talk about how they are bringing regenerative ag
to supply chains. Just Salad tells the story of its sourcing via highlighting a
certified regenerative organic ingredient on the menu for one month, along with
a deeper explanation of the benefits in an email newsletter to loyalty
customers. Ultimately, carbon labeling is one of many sustainability levers that
continue to push the needle further towards a collaboratively regenerative
future while enhancing brand affinity.
Don’t toot your own horn: Principles of successful purpose-driven ad campaigns
The sustainability transformation requires advertising with unprecedented levels
of creativity and empirical knowledge. Brand-Led Culture Change came to a calose
with a set of interviews examining successful, purpose-driven ad campaigns.
First, Thomas Kolster, aka “Mr. Goodvertising,” shared an ongoing
study comparing the impact of ads
based on the underlying narratives of
‘transformative.’ Purposeful ads
invite audiences to “believe in us as an organization to bring about change”;
while transformative ads convey the message, “Believe in your own ability to
bring about change,” with the brand as a coach rather than a preacher — putting
its audience at the center of the action. Early findings of the study showed
that transformative ads are 4-10 percent better at inspiring action.
“It’s time to start evolving how we look at purpose-driven ads and step more
carefully when we put on the hero’s
Kolster said to, and about, brands, “because how many heroes can we have in the
supermarket aisle or during a commercial break?”
“Ultimately, it’s not about putting on the hero’s cape but turning all of us
[consumers] into the heroes of our own lives,” Kolster said.
The next interview delved into Cascade’s “We do it every
night” campaign, which cheekily
addresses the need for water conservation by promoting the use of an
energy-efficient dishwasher every night. Research shows that dishwashers are
more water efficient than hand-washing; but many people still believe the
opposite. Elizabeth Kinney, Senior Director of Communications Homecare at
Procter & Gamble, explained the challenges of disrupting ingrained mindsets
regarding a low-engagement, commonplace behavior such as washing dishes.
In the final interview, Tionna Cunningham, Marketing Director at Stacy’s
Pita Chips, shared the inspiring story behind
Stacy’s Rise Project and
#shareforher campaign. As a women-owned and -run brand, Stacy’s felt the
need to support other female entrepreneurs — many of whom experienced additional
difficulties during the pandemic. What started with turning signs from Women’s’
Marches into emblematic packaging evolved into a full-scale, annual grant and
mentoring program where women entrepreneurs receive PepsiCo executive
mentoring and support.
Cunningham shared the story of domestic violence survivor, single mom and
Stacy’s Rise Project grantee Junita Flowers, founder of Junita’s
Jar — a cookie company that supports other domestic
survivors. On the verge of closing her business due to financial constraints,
Flowers was awarded a grant from Stacy’s Rise Project. Just as the mentoring
program was about to start, George Floyd was murdered across the street from
her Minneapolis shop. Despite a series of stressful circumstances and added
injustice trauma in her own backyard, Flowers persevered with the mentoring
program — and Junita’s Jar recently secured distribution into 300 Target
For Stacy’s, success means growing the business in ways that people can resonate
with. It’s counting customer growth but also the number of new women being
spotlighted, the level of engagement by employees, participants, program
leaders, mentors, subject matter experts, as well as staff across the retail
“Everybody wins when we team up and look at a full ecosystem of results,”
The moral of the story: Brands should be humble in their purpose work but still
recognize the opportunity they have to play a role in other’s successes, both
large and small. Sometimes social issues feel distant and unrelated to where
brands should focus their energy; but when a brand finds the intersections that
are authentic to its identity, quintessential examples of purpose-driven success
such as Junita’s Jar can demonstrate the power of business to uplift communities
when it is most needed.