Inside Track: Planning, Environment & Sustainability - In the media, In practice and courts, Cases and Legislation - Real Estate and Construction


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

At the end of 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)’s Office of Air and Radiation released guidance entitled “Principles for
Addressing Environmental Justice in Air Permitting.” Issued
as an attachment to a memorandum directed to all EPA Regional
Air and Radiation Division Directors, the guidance provides an
“interim operating framework” for evaluating
environmental justice (EJ) issues during the Clean Air Act
permitting process while EPA examines additional ways to advance
EJ.

The guidance sets forth eight principles that regional air
permitting staff should apply to permitting decisions. Companies
seeking air permits or permit amendments should familiarize
themselves with these principles and, where appropriate, consider
strategies for proactively incorporating them into permit
applications to mitigate the risk of adverse permit decisions or
extensive delays.

Although the guidance is theoretically non-binding, based on
experience, industry should anticipate that EPA will evaluate
permit applications and draft preconstruction and Title V permits
against these eight principles, likely in a checklist fashion.
Documenting efforts to meet each of these principles – even
if not required by law or as part of a formal EJ permitting
strategy – will likely help streamline the permit review
process and prevent undue delays in permit issuance. For
significant permitting actions and projects for which the timing of
issuance is critical, companies should consider a more robust
approach (for example, a stand-alone permit application
supplement). To the extent that a permit is denied or challenged on
appeal, one can use the same documentation to defeat the
challenge.

The eight principles are as follows:

  1. Identify communities with potential EJ
    concerns
    . EPA encourages permitting authorities to
    use EPA
    EJSCREEN
     or other mapping tools to identify EJ communities
    to engage with during the permitting process.

  2. Engage early in the permitting process to promote
    meaningful participation and treatment
    . EPA encourages
    permitting authorities to engage with impacted communities early,
    preferably before the relevant authority submits a permit. EPA
    recommends that permit applicants work with permitting authorities
    to provide opportunities for meaningful participation and fair
    treatment throughout the permitting process.

  3. Enhance public involvement throughout the permitting
    process
    . EPA recommends that both permitting authorities
    and permit applicants take community engagement a step further by
    providing adversely affected communities with the tools to properly
    engage in the permitting process, such as training on how to
    comment, access public data, and receive translation and
    interpretive services.

  4. Conduct a “fit for purpose” EJ
    analysis
    . EPA encourages permitting authorities to conduct
    an EJ analysis to achieve two policy objectives: (1) to address the
    fair treatment principle by evaluating potential impacts; and (2)
    to encourage meaningful community involvement. EPA provides a
    non-exhaustive list of elements that such analyses may contain,
    including but not limited to, an evaluation of the facility’s
    compliance record, and an evaluation of the facility’s air
    monitoring and modeling data.

  5. Minimize and mitigate disproportionally high and
    adverse effects associated with the permit action
    . EPA
    recommends that permitting authorities use all legal authority,
    including discretionary authority, to advance EJ. EPA also states
    its intention to submit formal comments on permits to identify
    available discretionary authority under federal, state, or local
    law that may apply to the permit.

  6. Provide federal support throughout the air permitting
    process
    . EPA states that it plans to collaborate with
    permitting authorities to provide technical support, guidance, and
    recommendations on addressing EJ concerns as necessary.

  7. Enhance transparency throughout the air permitting
    process
    . EPA reiterates the importance of permitting
    authorities providing transparency throughout the permitting
    process, including making the supporting administrative record
    readily available and clearly documenting concerns raised by an
    impacted community.

  8. Build capacity to enhance the consideration of EJ in
    the air permitting process
    . EPA stresses the importance of
    collaboration among regulatory authorities, stakeholders, and
    affected communities to share best practices for addressing EJ
    concerns.

EPA’s guidance is largely consistent with the recent
agency guidance on EJ best practices, such as its recent FAQ on considering EJ in permitting.
However, the targeted focus on considering EJ in the context of air
permitting and the direction to EPA Regions to share this guidance
when collaborating with state and local regulators signal a shift
in tone from prior guidance, with a sharper and more determined
call to action. This is consistent with the Biden EPA’s
stated commitment to hold state and local authorities accountable
through its oversight authority to ensure that they holistically
consider EJ concerns in air permit applications

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Environment from United States

AI Trends For 2023 – Environmental Law

Morrison & Foerster LLP

The advent of AI is drastically changing the environmental law landscape. Until recently, it was nearly impossible to track the environmental…

Federal Trade Commission To Seek Comment On Green Guides

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

First issued in 1992 and most recently updated in 2012, the FTC’s “Green Guides” are a series of written guidance and recommendations to any company wishing to advertise about the environmental…

New Year, New WOTUS Rule

Nexsen Pruet

EPA and the US Army Corps of Engineers announced on Friday, December 30, 2022, the final, pre-publication version of a “Revised Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’ rule.

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *