To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
At the end of 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)’s Office of Air and Radiation released guidance entitled “Principles for
Addressing Environmental Justice in Air Permitting.” Issued
as an attachment to a memorandum directed to all EPA Regional
Air and Radiation Division Directors, the guidance provides an
“interim operating framework” for evaluating
environmental justice (EJ) issues during the Clean Air Act
permitting process while EPA examines additional ways to advance
EJ.
The guidance sets forth eight principles that regional air
permitting staff should apply to permitting decisions. Companies
seeking air permits or permit amendments should familiarize
themselves with these principles and, where appropriate, consider
strategies for proactively incorporating them into permit
applications to mitigate the risk of adverse permit decisions or
extensive delays.
Although the guidance is theoretically non-binding, based on
experience, industry should anticipate that EPA will evaluate
permit applications and draft preconstruction and Title V permits
against these eight principles, likely in a checklist fashion.
Documenting efforts to meet each of these principles – even
if not required by law or as part of a formal EJ permitting
strategy – will likely help streamline the permit review
process and prevent undue delays in permit issuance. For
significant permitting actions and projects for which the timing of
issuance is critical, companies should consider a more robust
approach (for example, a stand-alone permit application
supplement). To the extent that a permit is denied or challenged on
appeal, one can use the same documentation to defeat the
challenge.
The eight principles are as follows:
- Identify communities with potential EJ
concerns. EPA encourages permitting authorities to
use EPA
EJSCREEN or other mapping tools to identify EJ communities
to engage with during the permitting process. - Engage early in the permitting process to promote
meaningful participation and treatment. EPA encourages
permitting authorities to engage with impacted communities early,
preferably before the relevant authority submits a permit. EPA
recommends that permit applicants work with permitting authorities
to provide opportunities for meaningful participation and fair
treatment throughout the permitting process. - Enhance public involvement throughout the permitting
process. EPA recommends that both permitting authorities
and permit applicants take community engagement a step further by
providing adversely affected communities with the tools to properly
engage in the permitting process, such as training on how to
comment, access public data, and receive translation and
interpretive services. - Conduct a “fit for purpose” EJ
analysis. EPA encourages permitting authorities to conduct
an EJ analysis to achieve two policy objectives: (1) to address the
fair treatment principle by evaluating potential impacts; and (2)
to encourage meaningful community involvement. EPA provides a
non-exhaustive list of elements that such analyses may contain,
including but not limited to, an evaluation of the facility’s
compliance record, and an evaluation of the facility’s air
monitoring and modeling data. - Minimize and mitigate disproportionally high and
adverse effects associated with the permit action. EPA
recommends that permitting authorities use all legal authority,
including discretionary authority, to advance EJ. EPA also states
its intention to submit formal comments on permits to identify
available discretionary authority under federal, state, or local
law that may apply to the permit. - Provide federal support throughout the air permitting
process. EPA states that it plans to collaborate with
permitting authorities to provide technical support, guidance, and
recommendations on addressing EJ concerns as necessary. - Enhance transparency throughout the air permitting
process. EPA reiterates the importance of permitting
authorities providing transparency throughout the permitting
process, including making the supporting administrative record
readily available and clearly documenting concerns raised by an
impacted community. - Build capacity to enhance the consideration of EJ in
the air permitting process. EPA stresses the importance of
collaboration among regulatory authorities, stakeholders, and
affected communities to share best practices for addressing EJ
concerns.
EPA’s guidance is largely consistent with the recent
agency guidance on EJ best practices, such as its recent FAQ on considering EJ in permitting.
However, the targeted focus on considering EJ in the context of air
permitting and the direction to EPA Regions to share this guidance
when collaborating with state and local regulators signal a shift
in tone from prior guidance, with a sharper and more determined
call to action. This is consistent with the Biden EPA’s
stated commitment to hold state and local authorities accountable
through its oversight authority to ensure that they holistically
consider EJ concerns in air permit applications
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Environment from United States
Code Promo 1xBet. Click Here:👉 https://popvalais.ch/wp-includes/inc/?code-promo-1xbet-burkina-faso-78-000xof.html
Code Promo 1xBet. Click Here:👉 https://popvalais.ch/wp-includes/inc/?code-promo-1xbet-burkina-faso-78-000xof.html