Predicting accidental release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment

Hochella, M. F. et al. Natural, incidental, and engineered nanomaterials and their impacts on the earth system. Science 363, eaau8299 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar 

European Commission. Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the Definition of Nanomaterial. Official Journal of the European Union L275, 38–40 (2011).

Kaegi, R. et al. Synthetic TiO₂ nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ. Pollut. 156, 233–239 (2008).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Praetorius, A. et al. Single-particle multi-element fingerprinting (SpMEF) using inductively-coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ICP-TOFMS) to identify engineered nanoparticles against the elevated natural background in soils. Environ. Sci. Nano 4, 307–314 (2017).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Flores, K. et al. Environmental applications and recent innovations in single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SP-ICP-MS). Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 56, 1–26 (2021).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Mehrabi, K., Gunther, D. & Gundlach-Graham, A. Single-particle ICP-TOFMS with online microdroplet calibration for the simultaneous quantification of diverse nanoparticles in complex matrices. Environ. Sci. Nano 6, 3349–3358 (2019).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Mehrabi, K., Kaegi, R., Gunther, D. & Gundlach-Graham, A. Emerging investigator series: automated single-nanoparticle quantification and classification: a holistic study of particles into and out of wastewater treatment plants in Switzerland. Environ. Sci. Nano 8, 1211–1225 (2021).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Loosli, F. et al. Sewage spills are a major source of titanium dioxide engineered (nano)-particle release into the environment. Environ. Sci. Nano 6, 763–777 (2019).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Wang, J., Nabi, M. M., Erfani, M., Goharian, E. & Baalousha, M. Identification and quantification of anthropogenic nanomaterials in urban rain and runoff using single particle-inductively coupled plasma-time of flight-mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Nano 9, 714–729 (2022).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

von der Kammer, F. et al. Analysis of engineered nanomaterials in complex matrices (environment and biota): general considerations and conceptual case studies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 31, 32–49 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Wigger, H., Kägi, R., Wiesner, M. & Nowack, B. Exposure and possible risks of engineered nanomaterials in the environment—current knowledge and directions for the future. Rev. Geophys. 58, e2020RG000710 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Bland, G. D., Battifarano, M., Pradas del Real, A. E., Sarret, G. & Lowry, G. V. Distinguishing engineered TiO₂ nanomaterials from natural Ti nanomaterials in soil using SpICP-TOFMS and machine learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 2990–3001 (2022).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Wiesner, M. R., Lowry, G. V., Alvarez, P., Dionysiou, D. & Biswas, P. Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4336–4345 (2006).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Gottschalk, F., Sonderer, T., Scholz, R. W. & Nowack, B. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO₂, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 9216–9222 (2009).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Keller, A. A., McFerran, S., Lazareva, A. & Suh, S. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J. Nanopart. Res. 15, 1692 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Song, R., Qin, Y., Suh, S. & Keller, A. A. Dynamic model for the stocks and release flows of engineered nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 12424–12433 (2017).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Sun, T. Y. et al. Envisioning nano release dynamics in a changing world: using dynamic probabilistic modeling to assess future environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 2854–2863 (2017).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Giese, B. et al. Risks, release and concentrations of engineered nanomaterial in the environment. Sci. Rep. 8, 1565 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Sun, T. Y., Bornhöft, N. A., Hungerbühler, K. & Nowack, B. Dynamic probabilistic modeling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4701–4711 (2016).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Zheng, Y., Mutzner, L., Ort, C., Kaegi, R. & Gottschalk, F. Modelling engineered nanomaterials in wet-weather discharges. NanoImpact 16, 100188 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar 

European Research Project: GUIDEnano. https://www.guidenano.eu/ (accessed 18 October 2022).

European Research Project (H2020): GRACIOUS. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/760840/de (accessed 18 October 2022).

European Research Project (8FP7): ENPRA. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/228789/de (accessed 18 October 2022).

European Research Project (H2020): RiskGONE. https://riskgone.wp.nilu.no/ (accessed 19 December 2022).

Isigonis, P. et al. Risk governance of nanomaterials: review of criteria and tools for risk communication, evaluation, and mitigation. Nanomaterials (Basel) 9, 696 (2019).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Read, S. A. K., Kass, G. S., Sutcliffe, H. R. & Hankin, S. M. Foresight study on the risk governance of new technologies: the case of nanotechnology. Risk Anal. 36, 1006–1024 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Walser, T. et al. Exposure to engineered nanoparticles: model and measurements for accident situations in laboratories. Sci. Total Environ. 420, 119–126 (2012).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Nowack, B., Mueller, N. C., Krug, H. F. & Wick, P. How to consider engineered nanomaterials in major accident regulations. Environ. Sci. Eur. 26, 2 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Kim, K. H., Kim, J. B., Ji, J. H., Lee, S. B. & Bae, G. N. Nanoparticle formation in a chemical storage room as a new incidental nanoaerosol source at a nanomaterial workplace. J. Hazard. Mater. 298, 36–45 (2015).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Pilou, M. et al. Modeling of occupational exposure to accidentally released manufactured nanomaterials in a production facility and calculation of internal doses by inhalation. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 22, 249–258 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Delvosalle, C., Fiévez, C. & Pipart, A. ARAMIS project: reference accident scenarios definition in Seveso establishment. J. Risk Res. 9, 583–600 (2006).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Debray, B. et al. in Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (eds Spitzer, C. et al.) 358–363 (Springer, 2004); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_58

Tixier, J., Dusserre, G., Salvi, O. & Gaston, D. Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15, 291–303 (2002).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S. & Ahmed, S. Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 98, 116–147 (2015).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Bottomley, P. D. W. et al. Severe accident research at the Transuranium Institute Karlsruhe: a review of past experience and its application to future challenges. Ann. Nucl. Energy 65, 345–356 (2014).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

ARIA. La référence du retour d’expérience sur accidents technologiques. https://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/ (accessed 18 October 2022).

Debray, B., Lacome, J.-M., Vignes, A., Gottschalk, F. Catalogue of Potential Accidental Releases and Accidental Release Model NanoFASE Project Deliverable D4.4 (NanoFASE, 2019); http://nanofase.eu/documents/reports

Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors (Light Water-Cooled) and Related Facilities WASH-1250 (US Atomic Energy Commission, 1973).

Ha-Duong, M. & Journé, V. Calculating nuclear accident probabilities from empirical frequencies. Environ. Syst. Decis. 34, 249–258 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Hendren, C. O. et al. Bridging nanoEHS research efforts. NanoEHS Scrimmage. US–EU.org (2016); https://us-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Hendren_Scrimmage_Intro_V3.pdf

Maynard, A. D. & Aitken, R. J. ‘Safe handling of nanotechnology’ ten years on. Nat. Nanotech 11, 998–1000 (2016).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Syberg, K. & Hansen, S. F. Environmental risk assessment of chemicals and nanomaterials—the best foundation for regulatory decision-making? Sci. Total Environ. 541, 784–794 (2016).

Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Krug, H. F. Nanosafety research—are we on the right track? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12304–12319 (2014).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Déclaration des substances à l’état nanoparticulaire. R-Nano.fr https://www.r-nano.fr/ (accessed 18 October 2022).

Risks. Lloyd’s Emerging Risks Team Report (Lloyd’s, 2007).

R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Core Team, 2018).